Tuesday, November 22, 2022

"Post" by Alice McDermott? More like "Shit Post," amirite? Up top!

The other day, Andrew, a writer who has kindly been reading both this blog and my buddy Karen's blog for years, posted in the comments that he was having a hard time getting into the stories from Best American Short Stories this year. This isn't new for him; although he's a writer himself, he generally doesn't connect much with a lot of the short fiction that is most heavily praised. In the comments, I was telling him that I, too, often don't connect with a story much the first time I read it, but that I sometimes end up deciding after reading it a second time that I can see what made other readers like it so much. 

From time to time I wonder, though, whether I'm not talking myself into liking something because it's simply easier to write about a story from a positive perspective than a negative one. I don't know why, but for some reason, it seems much easier to explain why you like something than why you hate it. Hate criticism is much harder, so maybe I'm subtly talking myself into thinking I liked a story. Or maybe I don't want to totally alienate potential publishers out there, because maybe part of me hasn't totally given up on being a professional writer yet. Maybe still it's simple cognitive dissonance resolution in which since I've already put the time in to read a story twice, I want to believe I've done it for something good.

Whatever the case and whatever defense mechanisms might be in play, none of them kept me from hating "Post" by Alice McDermott. I'll do my best to explain why, but since my heart is hardly ever in dunking on a story, this might not be much.

If you can come up with three reasons for something, people have to take you seriously, right? Of course. Three is very official. So I'll try to come up with three reasons.

1. Nothing new here. It's a pandemic story. Every writer has written one, which has prompted some of the journals I submit stories to to explicitly ask for no more pandemic stories. This one doesn't do anything new or unexpected with a pandemic story. It's all the same tired observations you could get from any social media scroll in 2020: gaining weight, wearing facemasks changing the way we interpret one another, the strangeness of not living our normal lives, facial hair, it's all there. There's not a single fresh observation in it about pandemic life or life in general. Nothing was surprising. There's an attempt to make it feel fresh by making it about a couple that rode out part of the pandemic together when they were already broken up. Something, something, longing for attachment and I don't care. Is it supposed to feel edgy because it opens with the woman, whose name I already forget and don't care enough to look up, was worried COVID had made her no longer like the smell of weed? If so, it failed. 

The title is supposed to refer to post-pandemic life, which is just starting when the story begins, but even with some perspective, time-wise, there isn't a single pandemic-related thought in the story I haven't already heard or read dozens of times. 

Mira. Her stupid name is Mira.

2. The language is dull. There are no exciting turns of phrase, no electric descriptions. I can turn to any page and find the same ditch-dirt-dull narration that's on any other page. Here: "He had bought her as well an oversized box of Advil, a four-pack of Gatorade, and a little white pulse oxygen meter that he offered to her rather sweetly." This is stuff any beginning writer taught to look for details could write. None of it is the kind of stuff that makes you think, "How did she ever come up with that?" Because none of it was hard to come up with. A bot that's been fed the outcome of six workshops at Iowa could have written it. 

3. The two main characters don't feel interesting in any way. Maybe the dullness is the point. COVID was being lived through by dull folks who are attached to their dull lives, and we should care about those dull people because we're all kind of dull in the end. But I felt nothing for them. They're decent people who care for each other, but that's not enough by a long shot. 

I found myself resenting this story for having been published in the first place and for taking up space in BASS to follow. This didn't feel like a story that was eating a hole in the writer's gut. It felt like a writer said to herself, "I'm a respected writer and COVID is a thing and I should write about it" so she did and she poured dull, professional competence onto the page until the thing was done. I will forget this story before I even start the next one, except I won't forget the resentment I feel for having read a story that never would have been published by an unknown author. 

10 comments:

  1. Thanks, Jacob. You honesty is refreshing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jacob, you have no understanding of good literature. The story is well written, the characters are interesting and the story ends up in a hopeful note in spite of the damaging effects of covid on mira and her ex lover. Unlike you, I like the name Mira and unlike you I found the story, interesting in its details, well Written and a good example of a human interest story. I really enjoyed reading it…

      Delete
    2. "This story is good because I liked it." Well argued.

      Delete
  2. My experience of the story was less negative, but that's mostly because I don't adhere to the "the story must stand on its own" rule. In the context of McDermott's stated purpose - to write something similar to, yet different from, Porter's 1918 pandemic story (which I've never read, but might now) - it was successful. I also am still looking at how time fits into all of these stories; this separates past, present, and future, in contrast with the preceding stories which mostly melted them together. I find that difference interesting, though of course as a standalone story, it wouldn't be unique at all. I had my share of complaints (too much how-sick-I-was detail, the idiotic decision to stay with a sick person when families living in the same houses were finding ways to isolate when one got sick) but I found a few interesting things to focus on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I sometimes wonder if my refusal to look at outside sources--including the author's statements in the back of the book--until after I've posted is a scholarly sound one. I want the story to stand on its own and I try as hard as I can not to know more than I have to about the author or their declared intent. In this case, I am going to stand by my approach, because I think excusing the story because the author said somewhere else she wanted it to be like Porter's story is a distraction and beside the point.

      Delete
  3. Thrilled to read your negative take, Jake. I was also hating it. Then briefly, during the scene where the paramedics are discussing with the two of them, take you to ER or not, well, there was a painful frisson of recognition for me. I experienced that situation with my brother and mother, and yes, my brother went in, and was never out of hospital again. So, for totally non-writerly reasons, I was kind of liking a moment, the wordless conversation between the paramedics, and i went yes, this is well-done. But overall, I share your dismay. I may read Porter's book, so it might have led me to consider something I might not have read otherwise. But again, that has nothing to do with the merits of this piece. I am also amused to discover that I don't connect much with a lot of the fiction I read. I am not disputing it, just saying I wasn't really even aware of that. Maybe I should start a blog of my own, where I discuss the fiction I am reading and loving. NO! Absolutely not. I will NOT do that. I am thrilled you and Karen are giving me additional food for thought but I will not put my own verbiage out there. But yes, there are many many pieces of writing that I really like. You just have not heard me talking about them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can fill the vacuum I leave whenever I quit doing this, which I keep swearing is any day now.

      Delete
  4. I found this post by googling the story because I disliked it so much! I think for me, the characters are supposed to be people maybe in their thirties, former "hipsters" who live in Brooklyn, but Alice McDermott is 69 years old, and it tells in every line. Adam and Mira say things like 'lousy,' 'utterly,' 'the olfactory soundtrack to a lot of laughs.' I just found it to be pretty out of touch and embarrassing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I get that I'm not going to like every story in an anthology, but this one stood out to me for its really not meriting being there. I'm not even sure it merited its original publication.

      Delete
  5. Totally agree with fellow commenters. This one should have gone missing.

    ReplyDelete

Feel free to leave a comment. I like to know people are reading and thinking.