Long ago, this used to be a blog about writing fiction and the travails thereof. It's been more of a blog dedicated to analyzing and reviewing short stories for about the last year. In part, that's because it's been good for me as a writer. Forcing myself to pay close enough attention to what some of the year's mostly highly regarded short fiction is doing, enough that I can write about it without making a fool of myself, has really helped me develop as a writer of fiction myself.
Proof of this came about a month ago, when I got notice that a journal I really like wanted to publish a story of mine. It's not the New Yorker, but it's a solid journal. I was actually surprised they picked me, because I kind of thought they were too cool for me. The great thing about it was that they wanted to publish a longer story of mine. It's very hard to get longer fiction published, so the fact they were willing to publish my story must have meant they really found it appealing.
The acceptance letter mentioned that I should sign the contract attached. That's pretty normal stuff, except there was no contract attached. I sent an email profusely thanking them for believing in my story and explaining that there had not been any contract attached, so could they please send one. I got no response for a week, so I emailed again. Two days later, I got an email that said, "Here you go," along with the attachment.
That was a little curt, but it was what I wanted, so I signed it and sent it back, along with the other things they asked for, like a photo and a bio. I later realized that one of the attachments I'd sent them was the wrong one, so I sent another email explaining everything and including the right one.
I didn't get any response on that. Two weeks later, someone responded in Submittable, the online website where a lot of journals handle the business of accepting submissions for stories. That person said "Sorry!" and attached the contract again, seemingly unaware that I'd already gotten it and responded through email. Whoever answered the email for the journal obviously hadn't seen my response, or hadn't forwarded it to the person who answered in Submittable.
So I attached everything again in Submittable, then sent an email just asking to be sure they'd gotten everything, explaining what seemed to be redundancies in replies I'd gotten from them. I asked to get a reply just so I knew they had what they needed. I've not heard anything in another two weeks since.
If you are a new writer who just got accepted for the first time or is hoping to get accepted for the first time soon, I want you to know how normal this is. I've now had eight stories accepted for publication. Six of them were like this. So if you struggle and struggle to get that first acceptance, and as soon as you acknowledge their acceptance you stop hearing from them, that's normal. If you end up freaking out and worrying that they forgot about you, or came to their senses and decided they don't want to publish you, that's normal, too. If you don't hear from them for seven months and then finally find out your story was published three weeks ago, that is also normal.
The people who run these journals are not getting paid. They're squeezing in time between life and work and their own writing to put your work out. They don't usually find time to hold your hand and make sure you know everything is going to be alright. But if they said they'll publish your story, they'll publish it eventually.
It was hard getting this far, I know. That doesn't mean the next steps are really any easier. But hopefully, if you at least know that it's normal for the next steps not to be any easier, that'll make it easier to deal with how it's not any easier?
Well, huge congratulations. Yes. I think it is the norm for journals to be quite out to lunch. I have had a story accepted 14 months after submission, and then another six months of waiting and back and forth before it actually appeared. Last month a little story of mine appeared, without any notification to me, just went live. OK. I guess we'd better celebrate anything and everything. If you are inclined to share more details, like publication name, I am all ears.
ReplyDeleteI'll share when (hopefully not if) it goes live. Thanks for the encouragement. Glad (and sad) to know my experience isn't unique.
DeleteI'm here somewhat late but going through a similar problem. The lit mag I submitted to was pretty responsive in the beginning, they'd reply to my concerns within two days. They're a paying magazine but haven't paid me, although it's been a month since the publication. Been about three weeks since I asked them about the same and I've gotten no response. This absolutely sucks but I suppose you're right about them being busy. Hopefully I haven't been scammed, haha.
ReplyDeleteWondering how this has turned out a few weeks later.
DeleteI think a second reason it's weird to deal with lit mags is that a lot of people who run lit mags are themselves kind of weird. I think you have to be to want to run a lit mag.
Probably the realest thing I've read all day lol. They were for some reason not checking the mail address I was mailing them on. All this while, they were also super-active on social media. I was getting really suspicious at that point so I DMed them, didn't receive a response for four days. But they did eventually pay me a week or two ago (thankfully).
Delete